140k global users trust Hubstaff for time tracking
See what our customers say
Toggl
“Toggl, was too basic for our growing team’s needs. We needed better integrations, accurate client-level time tracking, profitability analysis, the ability to cap hours per client or member, and approval workflows for manual time entries. Hubstaff’s features like project budgets and improved visibility addressed these needs.”
Clockify
“We were using Clockify for time tracking, but it lacked adequate accountability and productivity monitoring during work-from-home days. There were concerns about reduced productivity and honesty with manual time entries. We wanted improved visibility and control over remote work without invading privacy.”
Jibble
“We chose Hubstaff because Jibble was too buggy and created payroll errors that required manual fixes. Hubstaff provided reliable tracking and proof of work with screenshots. Plus they have a direct Deel integration to approve and push timesheets without export and import.”
Teramind
“We chose Hubstaff as a replacement for Teramind while moving from on-prem to the cloud. It fit our culture and HR constraints, since it’s used primarily when issues arise, and provided the evidence supervisors need, including activity percentage, apps and URLs, idle time, unusual activity alerts, optional blurred screenshots, and calendar context.”